tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765008161115599620.post3565998502976389269..comments2023-10-21T05:02:32.110-07:00Comments on Nick's Pix: MINI REVIEW: I COULD NEVER BE YOUR WOMAN (ZERO STARS)Actionmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16513109522731313470noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765008161115599620.post-44122896885501089032008-04-17T09:17:00.000-07:002008-04-17T09:17:00.000-07:00In total agreement on those three.I also love read...In total agreement on those three.<BR/><BR/>I also love reading David Denby, though don't agree with him often. Anthony Lane is smart, maybe too smart/analytical to be a film critic. <BR/><BR/>Nobody touches Ebert in terms of passion for the medium.<BR/><BR/>I was a huge fan of Janet Maslin when I was in highschool.Actionmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16513109522731313470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765008161115599620.post-50229830253854576232008-04-17T07:53:00.000-07:002008-04-17T07:53:00.000-07:00Agree 100% on Scott and Dargis. Those two along wi...Agree 100% on Scott and Dargis. Those two along with Ebert are my favorite of the non-blogger film critics.Waynehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05688329158692962476noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765008161115599620.post-88863048487647121182008-04-17T07:48:00.000-07:002008-04-17T07:48:00.000-07:00Listen, I agree with you. As far as I'm concerned...Listen, I agree with you. As far as I'm concerned, if Roeper is on that show, I should be on it as well. The guy was a pop-culture writer for the Sun Times before he started writing movie reviews on the side and getting on the tv show.<BR/><BR/>A.O. Scott and Manhola Dargis from the NY Times should have their own show.Actionmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16513109522731313470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765008161115599620.post-41092550023897228762008-04-17T06:23:00.000-07:002008-04-17T06:23:00.000-07:00Well, I'll clarify....he makes a good pick here an...Well, I'll clarify....he makes a good pick here and there, as any person off the street would do, which is essentially what Roeper is....just some doofus that likes movies whose office was probably down the hall from Ebert's at the Sun Times at just the moment when Roger needed someone. <BR/><BR/>What has it been...ten years? I miss Siskel.Waynehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05688329158692962476noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765008161115599620.post-11700474324234233532008-04-16T18:17:00.000-07:002008-04-16T18:17:00.000-07:00Ha! Love the Earl Dittman joke!Roeper is hardly w...Ha! Love the Earl Dittman joke!<BR/><BR/>Roeper is hardly what I'd even consider a "critic" but he does make some good picks now and then and overall, his sensibilites line up with mine a lot of the time. Not all the time but most of the time. <BR/><BR/>Having said that, after reccommending this turgid piece of cow-flop posing as a movie, I am not sure how seriously I can take him any more.Actionmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16513109522731313470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765008161115599620.post-49203675591002345722008-04-16T17:53:00.000-07:002008-04-16T17:53:00.000-07:00Oh, buddy. Never, EVER listen to Roeper. A couple ...Oh, buddy. Never, EVER listen to Roeper. A couple of weeks ago, he was a guest on "Top Chef" and they introduced him as "world renowned film critic" Richard Roeper. I never laughed so hard in my life. Ebert, he ain't. Hell, Earl Dittman he ain't.Waynehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05688329158692962476noreply@blogger.com